ISIS and Conflict Resolution
It was the President policy
that US soldiers did not need to land in Iraq and Syria rather US withdraw local
armies to fight against ISIS. The idea of containment policy was pretty right
that the ISIS should struggle and wage in war against their local authorities and
then the war has no relations with the West as expected. The strategy also contained
president initiation to include Iran in negotiation with the ISIS leaders.
There are two crucial points
inherent in the policy firstly, to show US unwillingness to make the situation
getting worse and secondly, Iran involvement to mediate the war should be putting
in serious agenda. However, it seems that Iran involvement in the crisis centre
is impossible because many members of Congress disagree if ‘red devil’ suddenly become
their good friend.
Unfortunately, there is
misconception in understanding the root of the problem. In classic war it
almost constantly emerged the root from the same pattern such as economy scarcity
and struggle for power. But ISIS is in different direction, they intend to
propose ism which could bring the world in peace and prosper, no matter whether
they could make it real, but that what they believed.
Underlining belief and ideology
to bring the world in order and prosper is critical issue to address and that the
points to put on the table to discuss, not by war and by including Iran, as US president
once suggested, and the world prominent religion leaders, the unending war might
not need to happen.
